Posterous
Mary is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
0023_thumb
 

m.m.massey

Apparently 140 characters isn't enough ...

What I'm Learning Right Now: How to Steam Artichokes

You learn something new every day. For me it's pan searing salmon and steaming artichoke today!

Instructions

Step 1 Cut about an inch off the top of each artichoke.

Step 2 Cut off base and remove small outer leaves, if desired.

Step 3 Pour an inch of water and a lemon wedge into steamer and allow to boil.

Step 4 Place artichokes into vegetable steamer, tips up.

Step 5 Cover and cook for 25 to 40 minutes.

Step 6 Cut into base of each artichoke to check that it is soft, and make sure inside leaves can be pulled out easily.

Step 7 Cook five minutes more if artichokes are not done, and then check again, repeating as necessary.

Step 8 Drain artichokes upside down on paper towel.

Things You'll Need:
Knives
Distilled Water

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 18, 2009
// 0 Comments

@Newsweek Sarah Palin Cover, they say they chose the "most interesting image" Your thoughts?

I've got to admit, this seems like an extremely low tactic and absolutely makes a statement about their opinions on her. There's just no way they'd take this same approach to a male public figure. I'm disappointed in the lack of journalistic integrity. Your thoughts?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   media  
Posted November 18, 2009
// 0 Comments

Detroit Getting a New Newspaper?

Last Updated: November 14. 2009 1:00AM

New Metro Detroit newspaper to debut

Daily Press to roll out 200,000 copies Nov. 23

Nathan Hurst / The Detroit News

Royal Oak -- A third daily newspaper for Metro Detroit will debut Nov. 23, its publishers announced Friday.

Brothers Mark and Gary Stern, who published daily newspapers during strikes in the 1960s, '70s and '80s, said the Detroit Daily Press will soon drop 200,000 copies of its introductory issue on doorsteps throughout Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties. The first regular edition will hit newsstands throughout the area Nov. 23, they said, and the first home-delivered newspaper is scheduled for Nov. 30.

The Stern brothers, who previously published a Detroit Daily Press strike newspaper in the 1960s, will charge 50 cents for their Monday through Saturday editions, and $1 on Sundays.

Advertisement

The operation, which employs a staff of 60, including a number of former editorial and business employees from other newspaper companies in Metro Detroit, is based in leased space at the former Daily Tribune offices in Royal Oak. Mark Stern said the paper will court readers who want seven-day delivery, and advertisers seeking a cut-rate print option. The Detroit News and Free Press reduced their home delivery schedules in March; The News is home-delivered Thursdays and Fridays, and the Free Press Thursdays, Fridays and Sundays.

"We're a 50-cents paper when the other guys are a dollar," Mark Stern said. "Our ads cost 75 percent less."

But the question will be whether the Sterns' publication can garner enough circulation and advertising revenue to survive in a tough media market.

Advertising revenues have plunged throughout the newspaper industry, as readers have flocked to the Internet for news and recession-battered businesses have cut their print advertising budgets. To save on costs, the Daily Press is outsourcing printing and delivery functions.

The Sterns, who have said they need to sell 150,000 daily copies to break even, are funding their venture privately but declined to reveal the size of their investment.

This has to mean good things if their media activity is picking up ... right?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted November 16, 2009
// 0 Comments

Mom and Dad making Facebook Uncool for 18-24s? Via @adweek

Is Facebook Getting Uncool for 18-24s?

Media agencies debate the consequences as usage among younger consumers appears to slip

Nov 16, 2009

- Steve McClellan


adweek/photos/stylus/114258-Online.jpg

In its early days, social-networking site Facebook was propelled to popularity by a college-age crowd that sought it out as an exclusive sanctuary in which to connect with their peers. For that market, it was an attractive alternative to sites deemed to have lost their cool -- like MySpace, which had become a haven for pre-teens and high schoolers.

Now, it seems, Facebook might be suffering a similar migration. According to comScore, as it has gained a broader audience, the older teens and twentysomethings that drove Facebook's initial popularity are using it less. And research by WPP Group's Mindshare suggests that group is reevaluating the site's worth as a tool for developing friendships. Others believe Facebook's cool factor among younger users is waning. "When you start getting friended by your grandmother, I think that's when it starts to lose its cool," said Huw Griffiths, evp and global director of marketing accountability and research at Interpublic Group's Universal McCann.

The numbers have fueled a debate among agencies about the implications for marketers. For some, it has raised a warning flag that if the trend continues, clients may have to revise their social-network marketing strategies. Others believe Facebook's broader growth outweighs any declining usage by the college-age crowd. And still others aren't convinced that younger users on the whole are less enthralled with Facebook, and believe some may be accessing the site via mobile devices that don't show up in the comScore numbers.

According to comScore, the average number of minutes spent online with the site among 18- to 24-year-olds fell in September for the third consecutive month compared to the same period a year ago. And the drop-off rate is accelerating. In July, usage fell 3 percent, in August 13 percent and in September 16 percent.
"There's a 'parents turn up at the party, the party's over' kind of thing going on," said Mark Potts, North American managing director for consumer insights at Mindshare.

Potts said signs of change began appearing a year ago, when members of Mindshare's so-called "Scout Network," a group of trend-spotting consumers scattered around the country, began reporting shifts in the way they and their friends were using the site.

"We began getting comments like they didn't know how they acquired 300 friends when they didn't know half the people on the list," Potts said. Others remarked on the shallow nature of Facebook friendships. "They talked about using it more to coordinate events and gatherings but less so overall," he said, because of something lacking in the quality of the friendships.

Separately, Mindshare in August surveyed 1,200 consumers about their social-networking habits. More than half of the 18- to 24-year-old respondents (51 percent) agreed that "social-networking sites like Facebook are diluting the quality of relationships." And 40 percent of that group said they now visit social networks that are based on particular interests, such as TV, music or movies.

The research and trend-spotter feedback led Potts to conclude that younger Facebook users are "adjusting their relationship to it in some fundamental way," which might call for marketers to adjust their strategies if the trend proves long term.

Others aren't so sure. "That [usage decline] could be for a small percentage of the age group, but I would want to see more evidence to show that that audience is running away from Facebook," said James Kiernan, svp and group client director at MediaVest USA.

Kiernan believes much of the decline in the comScore numbers is due to younger people accessing the site via iPhones, BlackBerrys and other portable devices and applications. That skews the numbers, as there isn't a single source that tabulates usage from all available platforms.

But even if the declines are real, Kiernan argues that it doesn't detract from Facebook as a marketing tool, even for those focused primarily on 18- to 24-year-olds. The site, he argues, "has one of the best demographic targeting capabilities because it is based on real information that consumers submit in their profiles" -- information likely to be more accurate than other sources, such as e-mail registrants, "because they want to show friends and colleagues who they really are."

At UM, Griffiths believes most of the decline is real but that the site remains a potentially powerful marketing tool. "When a brand like BMW can attract 400,000 fans to its Facebook page, that's huge," he said, and outweighs any "softening of a tight target group." The challenge for clients is to activate that fan support on behalf of brands. "What we're working on is figuring out how to predict when it will work," he added.

For Potts and Mindshare, the next step is to try to pinpoint exactly where the younger users are going. That will be the objective of an upcoming research project.

Facebook declined to comment.

See also:

"Brands Seeks Fans on Facebook"

"MySpace's Van Natta Seeks to 'Clean Up' Site"

"MySpace Music Video Hub Fuses Sound and Vision"

Clearly interesting article as this trend as now persisted for a few months. That being said, I still think it's too early to determine that 18-24 year olds are completely done with Facebook. Few of the most intriguing parts of the article from my perspective:

- Mindshare in August surveyed 1,200 consumers about their social-networking habits. More than half of the 18- to 24-year-old respondents (51 percent) agreed that "social-networking sites like Facebook are diluting the quality of relationships."
- The increased usage of iPhones and Blackberry's could significantly skew the data.
- Facebook's lack of comment.

Your thoughts?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted November 16, 2009
// 0 Comments

My friday night :)

Enter Gabriel, my 6 week old nephew. I love more than I could ever imagine :)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 13, 2009
// 0 Comments

Why Twitter is the Purest Form of a Social Media Service, article from @Wired Magazine

Illustration: Christoph Niemann

Illustration: Christoph Niemann

Last August, the people who putatively run Twitter — the small crew that three years ago launched the world’s fastest-growing communications medium — announced a relatively minor change in the way the site functions. The tweak would have a small effect on retweeting, the convention by which Twitter users repost someone else’s informative or amusing message to their own Twitter followers. Retweets start with RT, for “retweet,” and usually cite the first author by user ID. And, importantly, retweeters often add a word or two of commentary about the repeated content.

But there was a problem: Twitter itself didn’t invent retweeting; it was created by Twitter users. In a blog post explaining the changes to retweets, the company’s second-in-command, Biz Stone, called them “a great example of Twitter teaching us what it wants to be.” The good news, he said, was that Twitter was building retweets right into the site’s architecture. The bad news was that Project Retweet didn’t make any provision for the commentary that users might like to add.

It didn’t take long for Twitter users to respond: How dare Twitter mess with … Twitter. A self-described “social, search, and viral marketing scientist” named Dan Zarrella posted a passionate cri de coeur, writing that Twitter was about to “completely eviscerate most of the value out of retweets.” That night, Zarrella created a Twitter hashtag — another grassroots Twitter convention, which lets users group their conversations — called #saveretweets. A few tweeters liked the plan, but the general consensus was summed up by one user skilled in Twitter’s uncompromising brevity: “Very bad plan we hates it.”

The Retweet Incident is a distillation of how Twitter has come so far so fast — and how tricky it might be to keep the momentum going. In an amazingly short time, the messaging service — which does little more than circulate bursts of text limited to 140 characters to a list of people who have chosen to receive them — has established itself as a staple of social networking, commerce, electioneering, celebrity culture, public relations, media, and political protest. According to internal documents leaked earlier this year, the company expects to have 25 million active users by the end of 2009 and 100 million by the end of 2010. In 2013, it hopes to become the first Internet service to sign up 1 billion users.

There’s a big difference between 1 million adherents — roughly the number of people who receive tweets from Twitter’s CEO, Evan Williams, whose recent messages reported the birth of his first child — and 1 billion, which puts you up there with Google and soccer. Can something as elementary as Twitter become an enduring pillar of the Internet?

Perhaps, but Williams and Stone are going about it in an unusual way. They’re not laser-focused on how to fend off companies like Facebook and Google — which are madly integrating Twitter into their own business plans even as they take steps to neutralize or maybe buy it. And they don’t seem to be worried about money. The company’s revenue will be a modest $4 million or so this year. Even so, Twitter reportedly turned down a $500 million acquisition offer from Facebook last November and seems perfectly happy to burn through its roughly $150 million in investor funds.

Instead, Williams and Stone spend lots of time concocting schemes to boost the happiness quotient of a workforce that’s still only in the double figures — stuff like free lunches and inspirational visits by politicians, folksingers, and a director from the TV show House. The idea is to establish a corporate culture that will abide even when the number of employees explodes. “I feel like we’re 1 percent into this,” Stone says. “We don’t want to be that child actor who finds success early and grows up to be weird.”

But Twitter is already weird: It rocketed into the mainstream without really knowing what its service was. Its users defined it. It was those users who made Twitter into a throbbing global sensing organism that delivers instant opinion and eyewitness reporting on everything from presidential debates to football injuries. Though the company held a discussion earlier this year called “What Do We Want to Be When We Grow Up?” the mission statement is still a work in progress. “If there are three sentences I’d use to describe Twitter,” Stone says, “one of them would be ‘I don’t know.’”

As the company pursues those billion users and a business model, however, it may need to move past a studied ignorance of what it wants to be and shape its product more aggressively. The challenge is to do that without alienating the very community that’s fueling the company’s rocket-ship ascent.

Pages: Previous 1 2 3 |

Full Page | Next

Why Twitter is the purest form of a social media service: "But Twitter is already weird: It rocketed into the mainstream without really knowing what its service was. Its users defined it."

Also, 25 million users by end of 2009 .... 100 million users by the end of 2010. Wow.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   social media  
Posted November 8, 2009
// 0 Comments

50 Years of the Most Popular Christmas Toys, By Year Since 1960 via Permuto.com

Super fun to look through, making me so nostalgic and excited for Christmas!!

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 4, 2009
// 0 Comments

My 2010 #triathlon plans - Ironman 70.3 Racine, WI #triathlete

Racine 70.3

Last summer I completed my first Ironman 70.3 at the Steelhead in Benton Harbor, MI. It was a fantastic experience, one you can read more about here

Looking toward next summer I want to do another 70.3 (before possibly jumping to a 140.6??) but would like to try a new course. The only additional stipulation was that it be Ironman sanctioned, they are well supported, the expo is great and the turnout is always top notch. 

Spirit of the Racine has been around for a long time but this year, Ironman stepped in and made it Ironman 70.3: Racine. The course looks great, it's only 1.5 hours from where I live and I'll be able to train on the course before the race ... all good things!

Wish me luck and let me know if any of you want to join me :)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   training   triathlon  
Posted November 3, 2009
// 0 Comments

#Twitter to Get It's Own Mobile Device - Necessary?? via @WSJ

By Ty McMahan

When the team at Twitter Inc. hatched the idea of producing a mobile device dedicated to “tweeting” they contacted Jonathan Kaplan, founder of a gadget company that experienced one of the most successful exits for venture investors in 2009.

The TwitterPeek

Kaplan, who sold Flip camera maker Pure Digital Technologies Inc. to Cisco Systems Inc. for $590 million in stock, told the team the man to talk to was Amol Sarva.

Sarva is the founder of Peek Inc., a company that coincidentally aims to be the Pure Digital of mobile email. The company builds a sleek, simple, affordable gadget that allows people to send or receive email.

The result of the collaboration between Twitter and Peek is a version of the device built exclusively for sending tweets.

Clad in “Twitter blue,” the TwitterPeek allows all the same functionality of a desktop Twitter client - reading tweets, sending tweets, replying, retweeting and direct messaging – only it gives users that access on the go.

It’s really nothing new, though. Most new smartphones have access to Twitter. Sarva said the TwitterPeek is built for consumers looking for an affordable alternative to expensive smartphones with higher monthly fees. The TwitterPeek sells for $99 with a $7.95 monthly fee or $199 with a lifetime of service.

“I’m sure it’s going to get some attention because Peek is so controversial,” Sarva said. “People don’t understand there’s a market for an affordable mobile email device and they don’t understand this service is valuable and useful.”

Twitter hopes to encourage a larger share of people to send tweets from mobile devices. Only a tiny percentage of members use their phones to do so. So in June, Twitter approached Peek and the device took about four months to be ready for the public, a fairly quick turnaround. The device is nearly exactly the same as the company’s email product, the Peek Pronto, only the user interface is tweaked for Twitter.

TwitterPeek works on a high-speed wireless data network with nationwide coverage, so it’s always on and receiving tweets. Menus are navigated with the click scroll wheel and back button. Typing takes place on a full QWERTY keyboard with raised and illuminated rubber keys.

Sarva called the TwitterPeek a “modest gamble.”

“We just wanted it to do Twitter better,” Sarva said. “TwitterPeek is a big part of [Twitter’s] mobile platform.”

Sarva expects the TwitterPeek to be popular among those who use Twitter to promote their business, likely equipping an employee with a dedicated device. He also sees it becoming popular among those who never enjoyed using Twitter from a PC platform. “They tried it and don’t get it, but once they go mobile they realize how fun it is,” Sarva said.

VentureWire has had a demo version of the TwitterPeek for two weeks and the tweeting machine delivers on all it promises. It’s a functional, dedicated device for the Twitter platform. However, it doesn’t necessarily offer a better experience than free Twitter clients available for smartphones like the iPhone.

So, one must wonder which Peek will get more of with the launch of the new product – sales or hype. Attaching itself to one of the hottest Internet brands in the world has to be a boon to the company’s profile.

Sarva won’t go that far in discussing how his company can benefit from the relationship, only that he believes Twitter is a powerful platform and Peek has the fortunate opportunity to be a part of its mobile strategy. Sarva also declined to provide details on the financial arrangement between the two companies. Multiple requests for comment from Twitter were not immediately returned.

New York-based Peek has raised about $20 million from L Capital Partners and RRE Ventures. San Francisco-based Twitter has raised roughly $155 million in venture capital, including $135 million this year.

I just don't know how necessary I think this is .... wait, yes I do know, it's not necessary at all. Isn't the point of Twitter that you can do it from anywhere and everywhere?

With the ingenuity of the Flip camera behind them though ... who knows?

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted November 3, 2009
// 0 Comments

Football player, Tinkerbell and the Puppies :)

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Family  
Posted October 31, 2009
// 0 Comments